SF/F, sociology, some recipes. Updates every other Friday.

Category: book reviews (Page 3 of 3)

2020 Nebula Nominees: Short Stories (pt. I)

We’ll start off the Nebula nominee reviews with three of the short stories, ranging from a threadbare-elbow tale of Las Vegas to Edwardian schoolgirl cannibals to blood-stained generation ship cathedrals.


How the Trick is Done
A. C. Wise

This first story on my Nebula reading list is a strange one. It seems to take place on a Vegas on the edge of the horizon, slightly tilted, slightly too real to be real, a Vegas where Resurrectionists bring potted plants back to life and Assistants falling off the Hoover Dam grow sequined wings and, most importantly, where titles have power.

The story is how the Magician died, how the Magician’s Girlfriend/the Resurrectionist, the Magician’s Stage Manager, the Magician’s current Assistant and the Magician’s former Assistant all play a part in it. “How absurd,” the narration notes as two of them first meet, “that they should define themselves solely in relation to the Magician.” These two have had names for some time, but as they introduce themselves, their titles fall away. Similar moments of transformation happen for everyone, except the nameless rabbit called Gus (and his lack of a name is important) and the Magician himself.

Watching the way Wise played with titles and names, names and titles, who’s called what when, was its own delightful little magic show. And I thank her for breathing new life into a whole set of tired old tropes about ledgerdemain, making something new of them. I’m sure Meg and Becca, in particular, would appreciate that trick.

Moon Phase:
Crescent

Ten Excerpts from an Annotated Bibliography on the Cannibal Women of Ratnabar Island
Nibita Sen

I remember reading this little gem when it came out last May, I was quite pleased to find it the same story that I remembered. A ghoulish academic summary revolving around distant Ratnabar Island and an unspeakable supper in a girls’ boarding house in rural England, Nibita Sen has a keen awareness of how close academia and cannibalism really are.

On this read-through, I noticed how interesting it was to watch the names and narratives change over time, and watch the Gaurs start elbowing their way back into their own story amidst Rainiers and Cliftons and Schofields. And my God does Sen command the tones! I could place each excerpt’s academic era within a sentence or two, each one distinct and ringing true to its sources. And everyone, from the Angloest Anglo to the Gaur cousins, wants to take Regina Guar and the never-explicitly-stated Churchill Dinner, and carve them up for themselves, for their theories and their narratives.

One has the rather sickening feeling, afterward, that one has just seen the Churchill Dinner all laid out with ten separate diners all commenting on the delicacy of the meat.

It is a delicious sensation.

Moon phase: Quarter

The Dead, In Their Uncontrollable Power
Karen Osborne

At first, I thought I was reading a fantasy story – a cathedral, a sin-eater, a cup of sin and a cup of virtue, a dying cleric, and a bomb. But it quickly became clear that we were cooped up in one of science fiction’s hoariest of hoary stock plots: the generation ship gone bad.

But the trappings are just that, window-dressing for the two cups, the cup of virtue and the cup of sin, and the two women who drink from them: the captain, and the sin-eater. The one contains all the dead captains’ fine and regal memories, desires, impulses, the other all their…well, all their sins. All the slain mutineers, all the spaced excess, all the foul deeds decided. And Karen Osborne would like you to take a minute and consider what the souls of the unquiet dead can do to people. Especially their virtues.

What I love about this story is how Osborne twists the ending. You know how this story is, you’ve seen it a hundred times on the news and a thousand times in fiction. You can already smell the iron tang and viscera. And Osborne barrels down toward that fetid, horrifying climax…and what she does instead made me cheer.

Read it, if only to see for yourself.

Moon Phase:
Gibbous

Didn’t see your favorite story? Part II is here, including my choice for this year’s Nebula-winning short story.

Moon images courtesy of Emoji One.

2020 Nebula Nominees: Mathieu Takes the Nebulas!

Well, takes on might have been more accurate…oh well. Because that’s right, R. Jean Mathieu is going to the Nebulas!

For those of you just tuning in at home, the Nebulas are the professional award of science fiction, SF’s version of the Oscars, given each year by our union, the Science Fiction & Fantasy Writers of America. The Nebulas rival the Hugos for prestige, and this year they’ll be awarded in Woodland Hills, CA on May 31.

Like WorldCon two years ago, I’ll be going for professional reasons, but keeping my eyes open to wonder and strangeness. And in the countdown to May, I have something for you. Here, at Tor.com, is the complete list of Nebula nominations (including the special awards for YA, media, and game design).

Everyone is gonna be issuing their reviews of the novels. Everyone. But you folks know me, you know how I feel about short fiction. So in the leadup to the Nebula Conference, I’ll be reviewing all the short works of SF, all the nominees for Short Story, Novelette, and Novella. When and where able, I’ll link you directly to the story, otherwise, to the Amazon.com or publisher page.

In addition to crowning my choice in each field to win their respective Nebulas, I’ll be rating each story on its merits, measuring in moons from new to full.

Stay tuned as the reviews for your favorites go live! Which one will win? Which one will I push? You’ll just have to find out.


Short Story
“Give the Family My Love” – A.T. Greenblatt (Clarkesworld)
“The Dead, In Their Uncontrollable Power” – Karen Osborne (Uncanny)
“And Now His Lordship Is Laughing” – Shiv Ramdas (Strange Horizons)
“Ten Excerpts from an Annotated Bibliography on the Cannibal Women of Ratnabar Island” – Nibedita Sen (Nightmare)
“A Catalog of Storms” – Fran Wilde (Uncanny)
“How the Trick Is Done” – A.C. Wise (Uncanny)


Novelette
“A Strange Uncertain Light” – G.V. Anderson (F&SF)
“For He Can Creep” – Siobhan Carroll (Tor.com)
“His Footsteps, Through Darkness and Light” – Mimi Mondal (Tor.com)
“The Blur in the Corner of Your Eye” – Sarah Pinsker (Uncanny)
Carpe Glitter – Cat Rambo (Meerkat)
“The Archronology of Love” – Caroline M. Yoachim (Lightspeed)


Novella
“Anxiety Is the Dizziness of Freedom” – Ted Chiang (Exhalation)
The Haunting of Tram Car 015 – P. Djèlí Clark (Tor.com Publishing)
This Is How You Lose the Time War – Amal El-Mohtar & Max Gladstone (Saga)
Her Silhouette, Drawn in Water – Vylar Kaftan (Tor.com Publishing)
The Deep – Rivers Solomon, with Daveed Diggs, William Hutson & Jonathan Snipes (Saga)
Catfish Lullaby – A.C. Wise (Broken Eye)

2312 – Kim Stanley Robinson

2312

I really, really want to like Kim Stanley Robinson. I do. His ideas are beautiful. The Mars trilogy is the most in-depth analysis of Martian terraforming ever committed to print; Mark Watney couldn’t have planted potatoes without it. The Years of Rice and Salt combines a staggering scope (alternate world history, 1300-present) with a thoroughly original structure (following the reincarnations of a jati, a group of souls fated to meet again and again). In my middle-school years, he and Ursula LeGuin seemed to be the only voices for the earth and the wretched of the earth amidst a sea of gung-ho libertarians like Heinlein, Bradbury, and Frankowski.

But then you actually read the book, and your hopes are dashed. His characters are forgettable, his plots meandering, his prose wooden. I can’t remember which initial from Years of Rice and Salt is supposed to be the angry one, I or B. I recall a few passages of Red Mars, and one character because he was a sympathetic Frenchman at a time when we frogs were all “cheese-eating surrender monkeys” and one because he up and disappeared halfway through the book and I kept wondering when he’d come back.

I started 2312 full of the apprehensive hope that the last twenty years have made a better storyteller of this brilliant, idiosyncratic Author. I’m afraid Anne Rice was correct: we don’t really change, we only become more fully what we are. Kim Stanley Robinson is the Arthur C. Clarke of the 21st century: a consummate idea man who isn’t about to let mere writing get in his way.

2312 is full of absolutely amazing ideas: the Mondragon that has superseded capitalism, leaving “capitalism [as] the residual on Mars, as feudalism [as] the residual on Earth,” the art-world of Mercury and its capitol at Terminator, mutually-hermaphroditic sex, and, of course, the terraria.

terrarium.jpg

“Terrarium” for this style of vessel/colony, hollowed out of an asteroid and filled with biosphere, seems destined to enter the SF lexicon alongside terms like “ansible,” “waldo,” “hyperspace,” and “robot.” And Robinson’s inventive new ideas don’t stop at content, he has some brilliant literary strokes as well: the interstitial lists, extracts, and quantum walks are not only elegantly-presented exposition, they further the feeling of balkanization that Robinson characterizes his future with. 2312 has one of the very, very few examples of future works of art that effectively influences the story without being the focus of it, both Swan’s art installations on Mercury and those of other artists through the Solar System. Speaking of art, he even inverts the Famous Famous Fictional Trek trio near the end and lists “I Met Her in a Phobos Restaurant,” “Lovely Rita, Meter Maid,” and “We’re Off to See the Wizard” as drinking songs in that order.

But his characters. His plotting. It opens with a funeral and closes with a wedding, in fitting comic theater fashion. There’s terrorist attacks, two survival trials as Swan and Wahram are marooned, a romance that takes you from behind, the possibility of emergent AI turning against their masters, and the secret machinations of various factions…but none of them seem to connect to anything. Indeed, it’s hard to connect much of anything to anywhere. As one not-a-reviewer noted, “Swan Er Hong and Wahram prefer to run away from problems they don’t understand,” and the whole book feels less like a book, less even than a patchwork story, than it does like a picaresque. Our Heroes finish up one adventure (or, more often than not, leave it dangling like the worst Stephenson novel, as they did in Africa) and are whisked off by terrarium to the next one. Which is great! I’ve enjoyed a great many novels exactly like this, and even written a couple myself. Except, Robinson wants us to see a bigger picture and a greater drama to this balkanized novel, and it just doesn’t seem to work.

Which brings me to Swan.

I will probably remember Swan Er Hong a long time, if only because she consistently aroused vague disgust, which is probably not what you want in a viewpoint character. She’s over a century old but behaves like a bratty teenager – a smart one, but still emotionally immature and bizarrely inexperienced. She’s apparently never seen poverty on Earth before, nor been in love (despite a medical history in the middle of the book describing past loves and children), nor even lost a parent. She imperiously declares what is best for whatever planet she’s standing on or in, endangers her friends at least twice, and is generally an unpleasant person to be around and to read about. Her companion, Wahram, by contrast, is merely boring. In Kim Stanley Robinson’s oeuvre of forgettable characters, Wahram’s phlegmatic plodding is something even Robinson specifically notes as boring. Maybe this is why their romance seems more formal than real: on the one hand, you have the man who’s never perturbed even by losing his own leg, and on the other, the woman who constantly reacts to whatever’s in front of her. What kind of spark could you have there?

Kim Stanley Robinson has never been easy reading. I got that all the way back in seventh grade. But getting through it has always been interesting, even if I argue with myself about whether it was worth it. The sheer scope of Years of Rice and Salt still dazzles me, the meditations on humanity as cultivator or humanity as witness (Green vs. Red) in the Mars trilogy is some of the best philosophy in commercial fiction. Despite the meandering plot and the forgettable characters, despite the mannered prose and the hollow dialogue, I think 2312 was worth it. In 2012, when the book came out, the vision of a future where hope could be found, a future where humanity increases in genetic, cultural, and artistic diversity while still being human, a future where even Earth could be terraformed, was as alien to the omnipresent Singularity or Apocalypse as the liberal-green philosophy of Red Mars had been at the tail end of cyberpunk. Other authors have since taken up the call, dusted off the terraria, grappled with the intersexed and transcender implications, and explored other ways to terraform Earth. We wouldn’t have Sunvault and Reckoning without 2312, we wouldn’t have Ecopunk! without 2312, we wouldn’t have solarpunk without 2312. For that alone, the book is worth it.

(edited versions of this review have been crossposted to Goodreads and to Amazon.com)

Newer posts »